Historique: Task1: Seperation of dependent components

Aperçu de cette version: 27

Causal Analysis of simulated EEG data

Description of task

Motivation: Noninvasive electrophysiological measurements like EEG/MEG measure to large extent unknown superpositions of very many sources. Any relation observed between channels is dominated by meaningless mixtures of mainly independent sources. The question is how to observe and properly interpret true interactions in the presence of such strong confounders.

Download data (external link) here.

To read the data into MATLAB, type

The data consists of 1000 examples of bivariate data for 6000 time points. Each example is a superposition of a signal (of interest) and noise. The signal is constructed from a unidirectional bivariate AR-model of order 10 with (otherwise) random AR-parameters and uniformly distributed input. The noise is constructed of three independent sources, generated with 3 univariate AR-models with random parameters and uniformly distributed input, which were instantaneously mixed into the two sensors with a random mixing matrix. The relative strength of noise and signal was set randomly. The data were generated with this Matlab code. Note, that the phrase 'simulated EEG data' is meant loosely. The simulation addresses the conceptual problems of EEG data, but e.g. the actual spectra can be quite different from real EEG data.

The task is to estimate the direction of the interaction of the signal. A submitted result is a vector with 1000 numbers having the values 1, -1, or 0. Here, 1 means direction is from first to second sensor, -1 means direction is from second to first sensor, and 0 means "I don't know".

For all examples either 1 or -1 is correct. The most important point here is the way it is counted: you get +1 point for each correct answer; you get -10 points for each wrong answer; and you get 0 points for each 0 in the result vector. With this counting confidence about the result is added into the evaluation. It is strongly recommended that for each example the evidence for a specific finding is assessed.


Please send submissions by October 31, 2011 to

Guido Nolte
email: guido.nolte(at)first.fraunhofer.de

Note that the deadline was extended!
In addition, each participant is asked to provide basic information about his/her algorithm (e.g. a bibliographical reference) .


Légende : v=afficher, c=comparer, d=différences
Date UtilisateurNote à propos de cette modification Version Action
ven. 04 de nov., 2011 05:18 CET admin   35
En cours
ven. 04 de nov., 2011 05:04 CET admin   34  v  c  d  
ven. 04 de nov., 2011 05:03 CET admin   33  v  c  d  
ven. 04 de nov., 2011 04:59 CET admin   32  v  c  d  
ven. 04 de nov., 2011 04:58 CET admin   31  v  c  d  
ven. 04 de nov., 2011 04:55 CET admin   30  v  c  d  
ven. 04 de nov., 2011 04:54 CET admin   29  v  c  d  
mer. 02 de nov., 2011 11:13 CET admin   28  v  c  d  
jeu. 20 de oct., 2011 14:13 CEST admin   27  v  c  d  
sam. 16 de juill., 2011 08:07 CEST admin   26  v  c  d  
sam. 16 de juill., 2011 08:05 CEST admin   25  v  c  d  
ven. 15 de juill., 2011 14:32 CEST admin   24  v  c  d  


Rechercher avec Google